Reward-RAG: Enhancing RAG with Reward Driven Supervision
Thang Nguyen, Peter Chin, Yu-Wing Tai

TL;DR
Reward-RAG introduces a reward-driven supervision method that enhances retrieval-augmented generation by employing a reward model to improve domain-specific relevance and quality of generated responses.
Contribution
It presents a novel Reward-RAG approach that uses CriticGPT to train a reward model, improving RAG's performance across various domains through domain-specific fine-tuning.
Findings
Significant performance improvements on multiple benchmarks.
Enhanced relevance and quality of generated responses.
Effective domain adaptation of RAG models.
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce Reward-RAG, a novel approach designed to enhance the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) model through Reward-Driven Supervision. Unlike previous RAG methodologies, which focus on training language models (LMs) to utilize external knowledge retrieved from external sources, our method adapts retrieval information to specific domains by employing CriticGPT to train a dedicated reward model. This reward model generates synthesized datasets for fine-tuning the RAG encoder, aligning its outputs more closely with human preferences. The versatility of our approach allows it to be effectively applied across various domains through domain-specific fine-tuning. We evaluate Reward-RAG on publicly available benchmarks from multiple domains, comparing it to state-of-the-art methods. Our experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in performance,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Conference Withdrawn Submission
The proposed method for synthetic data generation is new.
To better understand the impact of the generated synthetic data, one needs to do a more rigorous evaluation for retrieval. For example, why their proposed method works better than re-ranking? In table 1, they mostly compare with older and smaller encoder models, and even in that case, their method only wins on the NQ dataset. In table2, the base LM for RewardRAG is GPT40/chatgpt, and it is not clear how the RewardRAG model compares with GPT4 with the basic RAG model. Since RewardRAG's contribu
* Clear representation. The authors include all the necessary information in the method section, such as detailed formula and clear figures. * The method is sound, and the in-domain experiment results are good: the proposed approach beats many baselines despite a smaller retriever.
* Authors claim the two benefits of the approach: in-domain and out-of-domain (line 161). It is hard for me to understand why the proposed approach can benefit OOD scenarios. The reward model is not trained on the OOD data, so it is not clear how well it can generalize, and the retriever is not trained on the OOD data either. Could authors explain more? * Therefore I am not surprised that the OOD experiment is not good. The proposed approach performs worse than baselines in all tasks if the inf
* Clearly written the contribution and method of the paper. * innovative idea of using RLHF for RAG encoder model training. * RAG has been bottlenecked by retrieval quality, and innovation on this front is badly needed and is critical. * Extensive choice of strong baselines.
* If the innovation of the paper is in encoder training, authors should devote more experiments to illustrate the improvements of doing RLHF finetuning versus other methods of finetuning. The main Encoder performance results in Table-1 shows results of other encoder models, but essentially no baseline that's comparable to your proposed "E5-large-unsupervised (ours)" which i believe is the RLHF finetuned version. I am not aware of the common datasets used to continue finetune retrievers, but havi
Unfortunately, I can not find any strengths in the paper.
* Overall, the proposed approach does not have technical novelty. - First, their claim about RLHF-like alignment framework is entirely unconvincing. They merely trained a reward model and then generated a synthetic dataset for further training. This approach is a common technique employed in numerous studies. - Also, it just boosts the performance of the retriever. And there are no specific considerations to the "RAG" aligned with human preference. - The achieved performances hardly rely
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPsychological Treatments and Assessments · Educational and Psychological Assessments
MethodsRefunds@Expedia|||How do I get a full refund from Expedia? · WordPiece · Attention Dropout · Linear Layer · Weight Decay · Attention Is All You Need · Linear Warmup With Linear Decay · Dropout · Byte Pair Encoding · BERT
