Stabilized Neural Prediction of Potential Outcomes in Continuous Time
Konstantin Hess, Stefan Feuerriegel

TL;DR
This paper introduces SCIP-Net, a novel neural network that estimates potential treatment outcomes in continuous time, addressing the limitation of existing methods that only handle fixed time steps in medical data.
Contribution
We develop SCIP-Net, the first neural approach capable of adjusting for time-varying confounding in continuous-time patient trajectory modeling.
Findings
First neural method for continuous-time confounding adjustment
Robust estimation of potential outcomes in irregular time series
Improved personalization of medical treatment predictions
Abstract
Patient trajectories from electronic health records are widely used to estimate conditional average potential outcomes (CAPOs) of treatments over time, which then allows to personalize care. Yet, existing neural methods for this purpose have a key limitation: while some adjust for time-varying confounding, these methods assume that the time series are recorded in discrete time. In other words, they are constrained to settings where measurements and treatments are conducted at fixed time steps, even though this is unrealistic in medical practice. In this work, we aim to estimate CAPOs in continuous time. The latter is of direct practical relevance because it allows for modeling patient trajectories where measurements and treatments take place at arbitrary, irregular timestamps. We thus propose a new method called stabilized continuous time inverse propensity network (SCIP-Net). For this,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
-- The paper is generally well-written and rigorous. It is also well-motivated and provides a solution of a problem of quite some importance not just in healthcare (the focus of this paper), but also applicable to other areas such as banking (where customer interactions are modeled in a similar manner irregularly, where interactions can also happen in bursts i.e. such as around a fraudulent transaction). -- The contribution, to the best of my knowledge is novel and interesting.
-- The paper obviously needs a lot of formalism, which is fine, but on the surface it seems like the network construction is essentially quite simple. But still, it is not clear how easy it is to train. It would be great to include more details on training details and difficulties, if any, in the appendix. On looking at the paper, one might think that the approach is complicated.
1. To the best of my knowledge, the use of inverse propensity weight to adjust the neural estimation of conditional average potential outcome in continuous time has not been proposed, so there is some non-trivial novel contribution in this work. 2. The paper is well-written and easy to follow. It is quite notation-heavy but I'm not sure if there is much room for improvement. 3. Good experimental results are shown on MIMIC-III and one-day ahead prediction of the tumor growth model.
1. Corresponding to Strengths 1., although the use of inverse propensity weight to adjust the neural estimation of conditional average potential outcome in continuous time has not been proposed, I do not see it as a significant contribution. It is a combination of TE-CDE and the line of work by Lok, Roysland and Rytgaard, i.e. A+B style contribution. Therefore, I think a score in the acceptance range is warranted, but not high acceptance. 2. There are quite a few statements in this paper that I
The paper's contributions are practically significant, as detailed in the introduction. The authors provide a thorough explanation of the problem formulation and model architecture. The paper is well-structured with (1) visual emphasis on key points and (2) a coherent organization of sections.
The numerical experiment section needs further details, particularly about the experiment setup (e.g., how the data are randomly sampled). I see that some of the details were referenced in the previous study (Vanderschueren et al.) and supplementary (perhaps most likely due to the page limit). However, considering different sampling strategies from Vanderschueren et al. and novelties compared to the previous studies that aimed to POs in discrete time, I believe it will be worthwhile to put more
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
