Conformal confidence sets for biomedical image segmentation
Samuel Davenport

TL;DR
This paper introduces a conformal inference method for biomedical image segmentation that provides spatial uncertainty guarantees, ensuring the true mask is contained within the confidence set with high probability.
Contribution
It adapts conformal inference to image segmentation, developing a calibration procedure that guarantees coverage and improves localization accuracy.
Findings
Confidence sets contain true masks with desired probability.
Using transformed scores improves the tightness of bounds.
Method validated on a polyp tumor dataset.
Abstract
We develop confidence sets which provide spatial uncertainty guarantees for the output of a black-box machine learning model designed for image segmentation. To do so we adapt conformal inference to the imaging setting, obtaining thresholds on a calibration dataset based on the distribution of the maximum of the transformed logit scores within and outside of the ground truth masks. We prove that these confidence sets, when applied to new predictions of the model, are guaranteed to contain the true unknown segmented mask with desired probability. We show that learning appropriate score transformations on a learning dataset before performing calibration is crucial for optimizing performance. We illustrate and validate our approach on a polpys tumor dataset. To do so we obtain the logit scores from a deep neural network trained for polpys segmentation and show that using distance…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
1. The topic of this work is quite interesting. By proposing the concept of conformal confidence sets, this work could provide spatial uncertainty guarantees for the outputs of image segmentation models. 2. Theoretical proofs are well formulated to serve as a strong proof for this paper.
1. A very obvious typos “polpys” exist many times, even in the abstract. That should be “polyps”. 2. It will be more convincing if authors could provide quantitative results for the segmentation performance of polyp segmentation. The evaluation metrics include Dice, Precision, Recall, etc. For comparable baseline models, authors could choose PraNet, SANet, etc. 3. Since the concept of conformal confidence sets can be generalized to other medical image segmentation tasks, maybe more public dat
* The authors present the problem in a formal manner, relating it to existing work. * The overall problem addressed is relevant.
* The motivation for the scores functions (logit, distance, ...) is weak. The necessity to choose the type and to even mix them gives the overall approach a bit of a heuristic touch. (While I do understand that you would consider your contribution here to be in the formal derivation of underlying theory, i.e., very much the opposite of a heuristic.) * The experiments only provide insights into one very narrow application. they are merely fulfilling the purpose of an illustation of the problem, b
- The idea of using transformed max logit scores is simple but quite effective strategy to produces conformal segmentation sets. - The presented experiments show the effectiveness of the method compared to using non-transformed logits.
1- Although I found the proposed idea of transforming max logit scores interesting, I don't think that the paper presents enough contribution to be presented in ICLR. The idea of applying conformal prediction to max logits for inside and outside of the boundaries is a direct extension of initial conformal prediction methods developed for segmentation, and applying transformations based on distance is an intuitive choice to refine predicted boundaries. 2- The paper does not present any compariso
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
