How does the teacher rate? Observations from the NeuroPiano dataset
Huan Zhang, Vincent Cheung, Hayato Nishioka, Simon Dixon, Shinichi, Furuya

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the NeuroPiano dataset of student piano performances, examining annotations, inter-annotator agreement, and predicting teacher ratings from audio features using machine learning.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive statistical overview of the dataset and explores the predictive relationship between audio features and teacher ratings.
Findings
High inter-annotator agreement on performance quality
Successful prediction of ratings from audio features
Insights into textual feedback patterns
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed analysis of the NeuroPiano dataset, which comprise 104 audio recordings of student piano performances accompanied with 2255 textual feedback and ratings given by professional pianists. We offer a statistical overview of the dataset, focusing on the standardization of annotations and inter-annotator agreement across 12 evaluative questions concerning performance quality. We also explore the predictive relationship between audio features and teacher ratings via machine learning, as well as annotations provided for text analysis of the responses.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications
