Flow Matching with Gaussian Process Priors for Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting
Marcel Kollovieh, Marten Lienen, David L\"udke, Leo Schwinn, Stephan G\"unnemann

TL;DR
This paper introduces TSFlow, a novel probabilistic time series forecasting model that combines Gaussian processes with flow matching, improving generative quality and flexibility over traditional diffusion-based models.
Contribution
TSFlow integrates Gaussian processes into flow matching for better prior alignment, enabling improved probabilistic forecasting and data-dependent prior distributions.
Findings
High-quality unconditional samples produced
Competitive forecasting performance on benchmarks
Enhanced prior-data alignment improves generative modeling
Abstract
Recent advancements in generative modeling, particularly diffusion models, have opened new directions for time series modeling, achieving state-of-the-art performance in forecasting and synthesis. However, the reliance of diffusion-based models on a simple, fixed prior complicates the generative process since the data and prior distributions differ significantly. We introduce TSFlow, a conditional flow matching (CFM) model for time series combining Gaussian processes, optimal transport paths, and data-dependent prior distributions. By incorporating (conditional) Gaussian processes, TSFlow aligns the prior distribution more closely with the temporal structure of the data, enhancing both unconditional and conditional generation. Furthermore, we propose conditional prior sampling to enable probabilistic forecasting with an unconditionally trained model. In our experimental evaluation on…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
• By utilizing Gaussian process to the conditional flow matching, the model reflects the temporal dependencies of the given time series data better. • The model enables both unconditional and conditional generations. • By conditional prior sampling, the unconditionally trained model could follow the given guidance.
Please refer to the Questions section.
- The investigation of techniques for conditional sampling is pretty thorough, and I think the proposed methods are quite interesting - The proposed method obtains fairly strong empirical results, and the empirical evaluation is convincing - Throughout the paper is very clear and well-written
- There is some highly relevant related work that the authors do not discuss. [Functional Flow Matching, AISTATS 2024](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17209) proposes the use of GP priors in conjunction with flow matching and studies techniques for forecasting with these models. Similarly, [Conditional Flow Matching for Time Series Modeling, SPIGM@ICML 2024](https://openreview.net/forum?id=Hqn4Aj7xrQ) uses GPs with flow matching for time series. The authors should cite these works and discuss the di
**Incorporating Gaussian Process Priors:** The main contribution—replacing the typical isotropic Gaussian prior $q(x_0)$ with a data-dependent conditional prior $q(x_0∣y^p)$ is well-motivated. GP priors are naturally suited for time series due to their ability to model temporal dependencies, and this idea is a clear innovation over existing flow matching methods. **Empirical Performance:** The empirical results show that TSFlow performs well compared to state-of-the-art models across various be
**Majors** **Difficulty in Parsing for Non-Experts:** The paper assumes substantial familiarity with flow matching and related generative methods, making it challenging for readers without a deep background in these specific techniques. It took for me considerable time to fully grasp the concepts, which suggests that the paper might also be difficult to read for a broader audience. **Lack of Runtime Analysis:** The authors propose replacing the isotropic Gaussian prior with a more complex GP
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTime Series Analysis and Forecasting · Data Stream Mining Techniques · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
MethodsDiffusion
