Shear thickening inside elastic open-cell foams under dynamic compression

TL;DR

This study investigates how shear thickening suspensions within elastic foams influence energy dissipation and deformation under dynamic compression, revealing the critical role of pore size distribution and shear rate effects.

Contribution

It introduces a combined experimental and modeling approach to understand shear thickening behavior inside elastic foams during dynamic compression.

Findings

Energy dissipation scales with an effective shear rate.

Shear thickening onset correlates with foam pore size.

Optical measurements reveal foam-fluid interaction dynamics.

Abstract

We measure the response of open-cell polyurethane foams filled with a dense suspension of fumed silica particles in polyethylene glycol at compression speeds spanning several orders of magnitude. The gradual compressive stress increase of the composite material indicates the existence of shear rate gradients in the interstitial suspension caused by wide distributions in pore sizes in the disordered foam network. The energy dissipated during compression scales with an effective internal shear rate, allowing for the collapse of three data sets for different pore-size foams. When scaled by this effective shear rate, the most pronounced energy increase coincides with the effective shear rate corresponding to the onset of shear thickening in our bulk suspension. Optical measurements of the radial deformation of the foam network and of the suspension flow under compression provide additional insight into the interaction between shear thickening fluid and foam. This optical data, combined with a simple model of a spring submerged in viscous flow, illustrates the dynamic interaction of viscous drag with foam elasticity as a function of compression rate, and identifies the foam pore size distribution as a critically important model parameter. Taken together, the stress measurements, dissipated energy, and relative motion of the fluid and the foam can be rationalized by knowing the pore size distribution and the average pore size of the foam.