Comment on `The Classical Limit of Teleparallel Gravity'
Philip K. Schwartz, Arian L. von Blanckenburg

TL;DR
This paper critically examines claims about the Newtonian limit of teleparallel gravity, refuting the idea that torsion must vanish if a regular Newtonian limit exists, thereby clarifying theoretical misunderstandings.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of recent claims about the Newtonian limit in teleparallel gravity, clarifying misconceptions about torsion's role.
Findings
Refutes the claim that torsion must vanish in the Newtonian limit.
Clarifies the conditions under which a Newtonian limit exists in teleparallel gravity.
Highlights misconceptions in recent literature regarding teleparallel gravity's Newtonian limit.
Abstract
We critically discuss the claims of a recent article regarding the Newtonian limit of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity (TEGR) in pure-tetrad formulation (arXiv:2406.17594). In particular, we refute this article's purported main result that if a regular Newtonian limit exists, the torsion of the limiting derivative operator (i.e., connection) necessarily vanishes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
