Quantum Machine Learning for Digital Health? A Systematic Review
Riddhi S. Gupta, Carolyn E. Wood, Teyl Engstrom, Jason D. Pole and, Sally Shrapnel

TL;DR
This systematic review evaluates whether quantum machine learning can outperform classical methods in digital health data analysis, highlighting current limitations and the need for more rigorous research to realize potential benefits.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive assessment of existing QML applications in digital health, identifying gaps, misconceptions, and the limited scope of current studies.
Findings
Most studies contain misconceptions about QML
Only 16 studies test on realistic quantum hardware or noisy circuits
QML applications mainly focus on clinical decision support
Abstract
With the digitization of health data, the growth of electronic health and medical records lowers barriers for using algorithmic techniques for data analysis. While classical machine learning techniques for health data approach commercialization, there is not yet clear evidence whether quantum machine learning (QML) will provide any empirical advantage for digital health data processing. In this systematic literature review we assess whether QML algorithms have the potential to outperform existing classical methods in efficacy or efficiency. We include digital electronic health/medical records (EH/MRs) and data considered to be a reasonable proxy to EH/MRs. Eligible QML algorithms must be designed for quantum computing hardware, as opposed to quantum-inspired techniques. PubMed, Embase, IEEE, Scopus and arXiv yielded 4915 studies between 2015 to 10 June 2024. After screening 169 eligible…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
