Hume's dictum as a guide to ontology
Adam Caulton

TL;DR
This paper defends a pragmatic interpretation of Hume's dictum, proposing that ontology determines possibilities, which aids in interpreting physical theories and understanding their interrelations without strict formal constraints.
Contribution
It introduces a pragmatic defense of Hume's dictum, showing how ontology can delimit possibilities, assist in theory interpretation, and be applied flexibly to physical theories.
Findings
Ontology determines kinematical possibilities in physical theories.
Hume's dictum facilitates interpretation and reduction of theories.
The approach allows flexible application without formal language constraints.
Abstract
In this paper I aim to defend one version at least of Hume's dictum: roughly, the idea that possibility is determined by ontology through something like independent variation. My defence is broadly pragmatic, in the sense that adherence to something like Hume's dictum delivers at least three benefits. The first benefit is that, through Hume's dictum, a physical theory's ontology delimits a range of possibilities, that I call \emph{kinematical possibilities}, which serves as a sufficiently permissive notion of possibility to sustain something like an intensional semantics for its claims, and a sufficiently demanding notion of supervenience to sustain plausible claims of inter-theoretic reduction and theoretical equivalence. The second benefit is that Hume's dictum allows us to work backwards from a range of kinematical possibilities to an ontology. This is especially useful when aiming…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPragmatism in Philosophy and Education
