The Role of piracy in quantum proofs
Anne Broadbent, Alex B. Grilo, Supartha Podder, Jamie Sikora

TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of anti-piracy proof systems in quantum information, demonstrating their potential for preventing piracy attacks and exploring their implications for quantum complexity classes.
Contribution
It defines anti-piracy proof systems, provides examples for oracle problems and NP, and analyzes cloneable quantum proof systems in relation to QMA and QCMA.
Findings
Demonstrated anti-piracy proof system for an oracle problem
Proposed candidate anti-piracy proof system for NP
Analyzed cloneable quantum proof systems and their complexity implications
Abstract
A well-known feature of quantum information is that it cannot, in general, be cloned. Recently, a number of quantum-enabled information-processing tasks have demonstrated various forms of uncloneability; among these forms, piracy is an adversarial model that gives maximal power to the adversary, in controlling both a cloning-type attack, as well as the evaluation/verification stage. Here, we initiate the study of anti-piracy proof systems, which are proof systems that inherently prevent piracy attacks. We define anti-piracy proof systems, demonstrate such a proof system for an oracle problem, and also describe a candidate anti-piracy proof system for NP. We also study quantum proof systems that are cloneable and settle the famous QMA vs. QMA(2) debate in this setting. Lastly, we discuss how one can approach the QMA vs. QCMA question, by studying its cloneable variants.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
