TypedThinker: Diversify Large Language Model Reasoning with Typed Thinking
Danqing Wang, Jianxin Ma, Fei Fang, Lei Li

TL;DR
TypedThinker enhances large language models by predicting and applying diverse reasoning types, leading to significant performance improvements on logical and mathematical reasoning benchmarks without needing larger models.
Contribution
The paper introduces TypedThinker, a method that predicts suitable reasoning types for problems and guides LLMs to diversify their reasoning strategies, improving problem-solving performance.
Findings
Performance gains of 3.4% on Mistral 7B
Performance gains of 6.5% on LLaMA3 8B
Performance gains of 7% on Qwen 2 7B
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities in solving complex problems. However, current approaches primarily enhance reasoning through the elaboration of thoughts while neglecting the diversity of reasoning types. LLMs typically employ deductive reasoning, proceeding step-by-step from given conditions, which limits their exploration during problem-solving. Our analysis reveals that certain problems are exclusively solvable through specific reasoning strategies like inductive, abductive, or analogical reasoning. However, incorporating diverse reasoning approaches presents two key challenges: identifying the appropriate reasoning type for each problem and exploiting this approach during problem-solving. Therefore, we propose the TypedThinker that predicts suitable reasoning types based on the problem and their previous effectiveness and provides relevant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Topic Modeling
