Public interest in science or bots? Selective amplification of scientific articles on Twitter
Ashiqur Rahman, Ehsan Mohammadi, Hamed Alhoori

TL;DR
This study investigates how bots may artificially amplify scientific articles on Twitter, developing machine learning tools to detect such activity and revealing that health-related research is more susceptible to bot influence.
Contribution
The paper introduces a machine learning approach to identify bot activity in the dissemination of scientific articles on Twitter, providing a baseline for future research.
Findings
Machine learning models achieved 70% accuracy in detecting bot activity.
Articles on health and human sciences are more prone to bot amplification.
The study offers a tool to monitor and analyze social media influence on scientific communication.
Abstract
With the remarkable capability to reach the public instantly, social media has become integral in sharing scholarly articles to measure public response. Since spamming by bots on social media can steer the conversation and present a false public interest in given research, affecting policies impacting the public's lives in the real world, this topic warrants critical study and attention. We used the Altmetric dataset in combination with data collected through the Twitter Application Programming Interface (API) and the Botometer API. We combined the data into an extensive dataset with academic articles, several features from the article and a label indicating whether the article had excessive bot activity on Twitter or not. We analyzed the data to see the possibility of bot activity based on different characteristics of the article. We also trained machine-learning models using this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
