Image-to-Image Translation Based on Deep Generative Modeling for Radiotherapy Synthetic Dataset Creation

TL;DR

This paper introduces a deep generative modeling approach to enhance synthetic EPID images for radiotherapy, aiming to improve AI-based error detection by making synthetic data more realistic and representative of real measurements.

Contribution

It proposes a novel VAE-based image-to-image translation method and compares it with existing UNsupervised models to improve synthetic EPID data quality.

Findings

VAE-based model outperforms UNet in key metrics

Enhanced synthetic EPID data reduces measurement discrepancies

Improved data can boost AI accuracy in error detection

Abstract

Objective: Radiotherapy uses precise doses of radiation to treat cancer, requiring accurate verification, e.g. using the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID), to guide treatment. To develop an effective artificial intelligence (AI) model for error detection and treatment verification, a large and well-annotated dataset of EPID images is needed, however, acquiring such high quality real data is difficult. While synthetic EPID data could be a viable alternative, it is critical to ensure that this data is as realistic as possible to effectively train an accurate and reliable AI model. The measurement uncertainty that is not modeled in EPID predictions but is present on real measured EPID images can hinder downstream tasks such as error detection and classification. Our research aims to improve synthetic EPID data through image-to-image (I2I) translation based on deep generative modeling. Approach: A dataset of 989 predicted EPID images and corresponding measured EPID images was used. We evaluate both paired and unpaired generative modeling approaches for this task. For the former, we introduce a novel modification of Variational Autoencoder (VAE) to I2I, a method that, to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously explored for this task. For the latter, we use UNsupervised Image-to-Image Translation Networks (UNIT). Results: Our results show that both models achieved some degree of I2I translation, with our novel modification of the VAE model outperforming the UNIT model in improving key metrics (mean absolute error: 4.1 cGy vs 6.4 cGy; relative dose difference in-field: 2.5% vs 5.5%; absolute dose difference in-field: 5.3 cGy vs 10.8 cGy). Significance: This enhanced synthetic data is expected to improve downstream tasks such as training neural networks for automated error detection and error classification in radiotherapy.