From Prohibition to Adoption: How Hong Kong Universities Are Navigating ChatGPT in Academic Workflows
Junjun Huang, Jifan Wu, Qing Wang, Kemeng Yuan, Jiefeng Li, Di Lu

TL;DR
This paper examines how Hong Kong universities transitioned from banning to integrating ChatGPT into academic workflows, emphasizing policy development and ethical considerations to balance innovation and integrity.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of policy shifts and introduces new paradigms for ethical AI integration in higher education.
Findings
Universities moved from banning to adopting ChatGPT in academic work.
Development of AI literacy and responsibility policies.
Implementation of new paradigms for ethical AI use in academia.
Abstract
This paper aims at comparing the time when Hong Kong universities used to ban ChatGPT to the current periods where it has become integrated in the academic processes. Bolted by concerns of integrity and ethical issues in technologies, institutions have adapted by moving towards the center adopting AI literacy and responsibility policies. This study examines new paradigms which have been developed to help implement these positives while preventing negative effects on academia. Keywords: ChatGPT, Academic Integrity, AI Literacy, Ethical AI Use, Generative AI in Education, University Policy, AI Integration in Academia, Higher Education and Technology
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · COVID-19 diagnosis using AI · Online Learning and Analytics
