Short-time Accuracy and Intra-electron Correlation for Nonadiabatic Quantum-Classical Mapping Approaches

TL;DR

This paper analyzes the short-time accuracy of nonadiabatic quantum-classical mapping methods, emphasizing the role of intra-electron correlation and providing theoretical justifications for their performance.

Contribution

It establishes a rigorous connection between short-time accuracy and intra-electron correlation, evaluating various mapping approaches and their ability to correctly sample intra-electron correlation.

Findings

LSC-IVR, PBME, and Ehrenfest methods fail to reproduce intra-electron correlation.

Some methods like PLDM and Spin-PLDM sample intra-electron correlation correctly.

Theoretical insights explain the limitations and strengths of different semiclassical approaches.

Abstract

Nonadiabatic quantum-classical mapping approaches have significantly gained in popularity in the past several decades because they have acceptable accuracy while remaining numerically tractable even for large system sizes. In the recent few years, several novel mapping approaches have been developed that display higher accuracy than the traditional Ehrenfest method, linearized semiclassical initial value representation (LSC-IVR), and Poisson bracket mapping equation (PBME) approaches. While various benchmarks have already demonstrated the advantages and limitations of those methods, rigorous theoretical justifications of their short-time accuracy are still demanded. In this article, we systematically examine the intra-electron correlation, as a statistical measure of electronic phase space, which has been first formally proposed for mapping approaches in the context of the generalized discrete truncated Wigner approximation (GDTWA) and which is a key ingredient for the improvement of short-time accuracy of such mapping approaches. We rigorously establish the connection between short-time accuracy and intra-electron correlation for various widely used models. We find that LSC-IVR, PBME, and Ehrenfest methods fail to correctly reproduce the intra-electron correlation. While some of the traceless Meyer--Miller--Stock--Thoss (MMST) approaches, partially linearized density matrix (PLDM) approach, and spin partially linearized density matrix (Spin-PLDM) approach are able to sample the intra-electron correlation correctly, the spin linearized semiclassical (Spin-LSC) approach and the other traceless MMST approaches sample the intra-correlation faithfully only for two-level systems. Our theoretical analysis provides insights into the short-time accuracy of semiclassical methods and presents mathematical justifications for previous numerical benchmarks.