Proposed importance of HOCO chemistry: Inefficient formation of CO$_2$ from CO and OH reactions on ice dust
Atsuki Ishibashi, Germ\'an Molpeceres, Hiroshi Hidaka, Yasuhiro Oba,, Thanja Lamberts, and Naoki Watanabe

TL;DR
This study experimentally shows that the reaction between CO and OH on ice dust predominantly produces the HOCO radical rather than CO$_2$, emphasizing the complex chemistry and competition between reaction pathways in interstellar ice formation.
Contribution
It provides new experimental evidence that HOCO formation dominates over CO$_2$ in CO + OH reactions on ice dust, challenging previous assumptions.
Findings
HOCO is the major product of CO + OH reactions on ice dust.
HOCO can convert into CO$_2$ via H-abstraction, but competing reactions lead to carboxylic acids.
Energy dissipation influences the reaction pathway and product distribution.
Abstract
With the advent of JWST ice observations, dedicated studies on the formation reactions of detected molecules are becoming increasingly important. One of the most interesting molecules in interstellar ice is CO. Despite its simplicity, the main formation reaction considered, CO + OH -> CO + H through the energetic HOCO* intermediate on ice dust, is subject to uncertainty because it directly competes with the stabilization of HOCO as a final product which is formed through energy dissipation of HOCO* to the water ice. When energy dissipation to the surface is effective during reaction, HOCO can be a dominant product. In this study, we experimentally demonstrate that the major product of the reaction is indeed not CO, but rather the highly reactive radical HOCO. The HOCO radical can later evolve into CO through H-abstraction reactions, but these reactions compete with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
