Euclid preparation. The impact of relativistic redshift-space distortions on two-point clustering statistics from the Euclid wide spectroscopic survey
Euclid Collaboration: M. Y. Elkhashab (1, 2), D. Bertacca (2, 3, 1), C. Porciani (4), J. Salvalaggio (5, 6, 7, 8), N. Aghanim (9), A. Amara (10), S. Andreon (11), N. Auricchio (12), C. Baccigalupi (7, 6, 8, 13), M. Baldi (14, 12, 15), S. Bardelli (12), C. Bodendorf (16)

TL;DR
This study assesses how relativistic effects, especially gravitational lensing, influence galaxy clustering measurements in the Euclid survey, demonstrating their detectability and importance for accurate cosmological modeling.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive analysis of relativistic redshift-space distortions on clustering statistics, highlighting the significance of lensing effects in the Euclid survey.
Findings
Lensing magnification and convergence significantly affect clustering observables.
Relativistic effects are detectable with high significance at high redshifts.
Modeling RSD without relativistic effects can lead to biases in cosmological inference.
Abstract
Measurements of galaxy clustering are affected by RSD. Peculiar velocities, gravitational lensing, and other light-cone projection effects modify the observed redshifts, fluxes, and sky positions of distant light sources. We determine which of these effects leave a detectable imprint on several 2-point clustering statistics extracted from the EWSS on large scales. We generate 140 mock galaxy catalogues with the survey geometry and selection function of the EWSS and make use of the LIGER method to account for a variable number of relativistic RSD to linear order in the cosmological perturbations. We estimate different 2-point clustering statistics from the mocks and use the likelihood-ratio test to calculate the statistical significance with which the EWSS could reject the null hypothesis that certain relativistic projection effects can be neglected in the theoretical models. We find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
