Book Review: 'Background Independence in Classical and Quantum Gravity', by James Read
Sebastian De Haro

TL;DR
This review discusses James Read's book on background independence in classical and quantum gravity, highlighting its precise notions and evaluations across various spacetime theories, and offering critical perspectives.
Contribution
The review summarizes and critically assesses Read's systematic approach to defining and evaluating background independence in gravity theories.
Findings
Provides a detailed overview of background independence concepts
Evaluates the application of background independence in different theories
Highlights strengths and disagreements with the book's approach
Abstract
This is a review of James Read's insightful book, Background Independence in Classical and Quantum Gravity. The book introduces various notions of background-independence which it then makes precise, and uses to make verdicts about background-independence on a wide range of examples of spacetime theories in both classical and quantum gravity. This short book is, in several ways, a worthy example of how technical philosophy of physics ought to be done. I first discuss the content, then raise a number points where I disagree with the book.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
