Exploring the catastrophic regime: thermodynamics and disintegration in head-on planetary collisions

TL;DR

This study investigates the thermodynamics and disintegration processes in high-energy head-on planetary collisions, revealing complex interactions that challenge existing scaling laws and emphasizing the importance of phase boundary modeling.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of the thermodynamic and energy dynamics in catastrophic planetary impacts, highlighting the need for refined models and caution in applying scaling laws.

Findings

Fragmentary disintegration occurs at lower impact energies than previously thought.

Mass of the largest remnant diverges from existing scaling laws in high-energy impacts.

Accurate liquid-vapour phase boundary modeling is crucial for impact simulations.

Abstract

Head-on giant impacts (collisions between planet-size bodies) are frequently used to study the planet formation process as they present an extreme configuration where the two colliding bodies are greatly disturbed. With limited computing resources, focusing on these extreme impacts eases the burden of exploring a large parameter space. Results from head-on impacts are often then extended to study oblique impacts with angle corrections or used as initial conditions for other calculations, for example, the evolution of ejected debris. In this study, we conduct a detailed investigation of the thermodynamic and energy budget evolution of high-energy head-on giant impacts, entering the catastrophic impacts regime, for target masses between 0.001 and 12 M$_{\oplus}$. We demonstrate the complex interplay of gravitational forces, shock dynamics, and thermodynamic processing in head-on impacts at high energy. Our study illustrates that frequent interactions of core material with the liquid side of the vapour curve could have cumulative effects on the post-collision remnants, leading to fragmentary disintegration occurring at lower impact energy. This results in the mass of the largest remnant diverging significantly from previously developed scaling laws. These findings suggest two key considerations: 1) head-on planetary collisions for different target masses do not behave similarly, so caution is needed when applying scaling laws across a broad parameter space; 2) an accurate model of the liquid-vapour phase boundary is essential for modeling giant impacts. Our findings highlight the need for careful consideration of impact configurations in planetary formation studies, as head-on impacts involve a complex interplay between thermodynamic processing, shocks, gravitational forces, and other factors.