A translation of L. Euler's " Examination of an artifice for propelling a ship by the principle of internal motion"

TL;DR

This paper provides a translation and analysis of Euler's 1750 critique of Bernoulli's idea that a ship could be propelled by internal forces alone, illustrating foundational debates in classical mechanics.

Contribution

It offers a modern translation and commentary on Euler's historical critique of internal propulsion, emphasizing the development of classical mechanics principles.

Findings

Euler's critique clarifies the impossibility of internal propulsion contradicting mechanics.

Historical context enhances understanding of classical mechanics development.

Highlights the debate between Euler and Bernoulli on propulsion principles.

Abstract

The following translation of Leonhard Euler's "Examination of an Artifice for Propelling a Ship by the Principle of Internal Motion," originally published in 1750, offers a glimpse into a fascinating historical debate in the field of mechanics. This work critically examines a proposal by Jacob Bernoulli, one of the foremost mathematicians of the 17th century, who suggested that a ship could be propelled by forces entirely confined within the vessel itself-a concept that contradicts the principles of classical mechanics. This translation is intended to make Euler's insights accessible to a modern audience, highlighting the enduring relevance of these foundational principles. The commentary provided offers context and clarification, drawing parallels between Euler's work and contemporary understandings of mechanics. By examining the arguments of two of the greatest minds in the history of science, readers are invited to appreciate the depth and precision of classical mechanics as it was developed during the Enlightenment.