Using fractal dimension to predict the risk of intra cranial aneurysm rupture with machine learning
Pradyumna Elavarthi, Anca Ralescu, Mark D. Johnson, Charles J., Prestigiacomo

TL;DR
This study evaluates machine learning models to predict intracranial aneurysm rupture risk, highlighting fractal dimension as a key feature, with Random Forest achieving the highest accuracy among tested algorithms.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of machine learning models, especially Random Forest, in predicting aneurysm rupture risk using radiographic features, emphasizing the importance of fractal dimension.
Findings
Random Forest achieved 85% accuracy.
Fractal dimension was the most important feature.
ML models outperformed traditional risk scores.
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) that rupture result in significant morbidity and mortality. While traditional risk models such as the PHASES score are useful in clinical decision making, machine learning (ML) models offer the potential to provide more accuracy. In this study, we compared the performance of four different machine learning algorithms Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Multi Layer Perceptron (MLP) on clinical and radiographic features to predict rupture status of intracranial aneurysms. Among the models, RF achieved the highest accuracy (85%) with balanced precision and recall, while MLP had the lowest overall performance (accuracy of 63%). Fractal dimension ranked as the most important feature for model performance across all models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRetinal Imaging and Analysis
