Impartial Selection Under Combinatorial Constraints
Javier Cembrano, Max Klimm, Arturo Merino

TL;DR
This paper studies impartial selection mechanisms under combinatorial constraints, proposing new algorithms with provable approximation guarantees for selecting agents based on weighted nominations while maintaining strategic resistance.
Contribution
It introduces impartial mechanisms for weighted nominations under various combinatorial constraints, including independence systems, matroids, and knapsack constraints, with specific approximation ratios.
Findings
Mechanism extends to general independence systems with 1/4-approximation.
Achieves 1/3 and 1/2 approximation ratios for knapsack and matroid constraints.
Provides an impartial, 1/3-approximate mechanism for graphic matroids with multiple nominations.
Abstract
Impartial selection problems are concerned with the selection of one or more agents from a set based on mutual nominations from within the set. To avoid strategic nominations of the agents, the axiom of impartiality requires that the selection of each agent is independent of the nominations cast by that agent. This paper initiates the study of impartial selection problems where the nominations are weighted and the set of agents that can be selected is restricted by a combinatorial constraint. We call a selection mechanism -optimal if, for every instance, the ratio between the total sum of weighted nominations of the selected set and that of the best feasible set of agents is at least . We show that a natural extension of a mechanism studied for the selection of a single agent remains impartial and -optimal for general independence systems, and we generalize…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBusiness Strategy and Innovation
