LexEval: A Comprehensive Chinese Legal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models
Haitao Li, You Chen, Qingyao Ai, Yueyue Wu, Ruizhe Zhang, Yiqun Liu

TL;DR
LexEval is a large, comprehensive Chinese legal benchmark designed to evaluate the capabilities, ethical considerations, and limitations of large language models in legal applications, aiding in safer and more reliable deployment.
Contribution
The paper introduces LexEval, the largest Chinese legal evaluation dataset with a new taxonomy of legal abilities, providing a standardized benchmark for LLM assessment in legal contexts.
Findings
Evaluated 38 LLMs revealing performance gaps
Identified ethical and knowledge application challenges
Provided insights for future legal LLM development
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in natural language processing tasks and demonstrate considerable potential in the legal domain. However, legal applications demand high standards of accuracy, reliability, and fairness. Applying existing LLMs to legal systems without careful evaluation of their potential and limitations could pose significant risks in legal practice. To this end, we introduce a standardized comprehensive Chinese legal benchmark LexEval. This benchmark is notable in the following three aspects: (1) Ability Modeling: We propose a new taxonomy of legal cognitive abilities to organize different tasks. (2) Scale: To our knowledge, LexEval is currently the largest Chinese legal evaluation dataset, comprising 23 tasks and 14,150 questions. (3) Data: we utilize formatted existing datasets, exam datasets and newly annotated datasets by legal experts to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputational and Text Analysis Methods · Artificial Intelligence in Law
