Fuel tax loss in a world of electric mobility: A window of opportunity for congestion pricing
Thi Ngoc Nguyen, Felix Muesgens

TL;DR
This paper explores how congestion pricing in Berlin can offset declining fuel tax revenues due to electric mobility, while improving traffic flow, reducing emissions, and addressing social equity concerns.
Contribution
It demonstrates that a road-and-time-variant congestion toll can replace lost fuel tax revenue and promote sustainable transport behavior in a major city.
Findings
Congestion tolls can compensate for fuel tax revenue loss.
Traffic delay time reduced by 28%.
CO2 emissions decrease by over 5%.
Abstract
The continued transition towards electric mobility will decrease energy tax revenues worldwide, which has substantial implications for government funds. At the same time, demand for transportation is ever increasing, which in turn increases congestion problems. Combining both challenges, this paper assesses the effectiveness of congestion pricing as a sustainable revenue stream to offset fuel tax loss in 2030 while simultaneously enhancing efficiency in the transport sector. A congestion-based toll that is road-and-time-variant is simulated for the greater Berlin area in Germany using the multi-agent transport simulation (MATSim) software. Through the simulation results, this paper quantifies the impacts of the toll on the governmental revenue, traffic management, environment, social welfare, and the distribution effects. We find that the revenue from congestion tolls in a metropolitan…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Smart Grid Energy Management
