Indirect punishment can outperform direct punishment in promoting cooperation in structured populations
Yujia Wen, Zhixue He, Chen Shen, Jun Tanimoto

TL;DR
This study shows that in structured populations, a spatially explicit form of indirect punishment can more effectively promote cooperation than direct punishment under certain low-cost conditions, even when network effects alone are insufficient.
Contribution
It introduces a novel spatially explicit model of indirect punishment targeting second-order defectors, demonstrating its potential to outperform direct punishment in fostering cooperation.
Findings
Indirect punishment outperforms direct punishment at low costs and fines.
Effectiveness depends on specific cost-fine parameter regions.
Stricter penalties for defectors can be achieved without higher costs for punishers.
Abstract
Indirect punishment traditionally sustains cooperation in social systems through reputation or norms, often by reducing defectors' payoffs indirectly. In this study, we redefine indirect punishment for structured populations as a spatially explicit mechanism, where individuals on a square lattice target second-order defectors--those harming their neighbors--rather than their own immediate defectors, guided by the principle: "I help you by punishing those who defect against you". Using evolutionary simulations, we compare this adapted indirect punishment to direct punishment, where individuals punish immediate defectors. Results show that within a narrow range of low punishment costs and fines, adapted indirect punishment outperforms direct punishment in promoting cooperation. However, outside this cost-fine region, outcomes vary: direct punishment may excel, both may be equally…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
