Magnons on a dice lattice: topological features and transport properties

TL;DR

This paper investigates the topological properties and transport phenomena of magnons on a dice lattice, revealing how various magnetic interactions induce different topological phases and phase transitions, with implications for magnonic devices.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of how Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, pseudodipolar interaction, and anisotropies influence magnon topological phases on a dice lattice, including flat band effects.

Findings

DMI and PDI induce topological phase transitions.

Edge modes are supported in nanoribbon geometries.

Nonuniform anisotropy leads to richer topological phases.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the topological properties of magnons on a dice lattice, also known as the dual of a more widely studied kagome lattice. This structure has a central atom at the center of the honeycomb lattice, which leads to the formation of a flat band. Magnetic Hamiltonians associated with the magnon bands are scarcely studied in this flat band system, which motivates us on examining an interplay of different magnetic spin interactions, such as the Heisenberg exchange, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI), pseudodipolar interaction (PDI) and magnetocrystalline anisotropies in a dice lattice. In particular, the objective is to ascertain their roles in inducing various topological phases and the phase transitions therein. The competing effects of the DMI and the PDI in inducing transitions from either topological to topological or topological to trivial phases are noted and the corresponding results are supported via the magnon band structures, presence (or absence) of edge modes in a nanoribbon geometry, and the transport characteristic, namely the discontinuities in the thermal Hall conductivities. Meanwhile, the magnetocrystalline anisotropy also plays an intriguing role, where distinct (nonuniform) values at the different sublattice sites result in a richer topological landscape with Chern numbers $C = \pm 2$, $\pm 1$, and $0$, while a uniform anisotropy yields only $C = \pm 2$ and $0$. This discrepancy arises from the broken valley symmetry in the nonuniform case. Finally, we have enriched our understanding on the role of the flat band in impacting the topological features by comparing some of the key results with that of a honeycomb structure.