Algorithms and complexity for monitoring edge-geodetic sets in graphs
Florent Foucaud, Clara Marcille, R. B. Sandeep, Sagnik Sen, S Taruni

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of monitoring edge-geodetic sets in graphs, establishing hardness results, algorithmic solutions for specific graph classes, and approximation algorithms for the general problem.
Contribution
It proves NP-hardness and intractability results for the problem, and provides polynomial-time, fixed-parameter tractable, and approximation algorithms for various graph classes.
Findings
NP-hardness for 2-apex 3-degenerate graphs
No subexponential algorithm under ETH for 3-degenerate graphs
Polynomial-time algorithm for interval graphs
Abstract
A monitoring edge-geodetic set of a graph is a subset of its vertices such that for every edge in the graph, deleting increases the distance between at least one pair of vertices in . We study the following computational problem \textsc{MEG-set}: given a graph and an integer , decide whether has a monitoring edge geodetic set of size at most . We prove that the problem is NP-hard even for 2-apex 3-degenerate graphs, improving a result by Haslegrave (Discrete Applied Mathematics 2023). Additionally, we prove that the problem cannot be solved in subexponential-time, assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, even for 3-degenerate graphs. Further, we prove that the optimization version of the problem is APX-hard, even for 4-degenerate graphs. Complementing these hardness results, we prove that the problem admits a polynomial-time algorithm for interval graphs, a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
