A Systematisation of Knowledge: Connecting European Digital Identities with Web3
Ben Biedermann, Matthew Scerri, Victoria Kozlova, Joshua, Ellul

TL;DR
This paper clarifies the distinctions between self-sovereign identity and decentralised identity, explores their technological evolution, and discusses their relation to European digital identity regulations and Web3, highlighting gaps for future integration.
Contribution
It systematically differentiates SSI from decentralised identity, analyzes their development in relation to OIDC and eIDAS 2.0, and proposes directions for connecting Web3 with European digital identity frameworks.
Findings
Decentralised identity emerged alongside OpenID Connect.
SSI is linked to blockchain-based solutions.
Incompatibility exists between OIDC under eIDAS 2.0 and Web3.
Abstract
The terms self-sovereign identity (SSI) and decentralised identity are often used interchangeably, which results in increasing ambiguity when solutions are being investigated and compared. This article aims to provide a clear distinction between the two concepts in relation to the revised Regulation as Regards establishing the European Digital Identity Framework (eIDAS 2.0) by providing a systematisation of knowledge of technological developments that led up to implementation of eIDAS 2.0. Applying an inductive exploratory approach, relevant literature was selected iteratively in waves over a nine months time frame and covers literature between 2005 and 2024. The review found that the decentralised identity sector emerged adjacent to the OpenID Connect (OIDC) paradigm of Open Authentication, whereas SSI denotes the sector's shift towards blockchain-based solutions. In this study, it is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
