LW2G: Learning Whether to Grow for Prompt-based Continual Learning
Qian Feng, Da-wei Zhou, Hanbin Zhao, Chao Zhang, Jiahua Dong, Dengxin Dai, Hui Qian

TL;DR
LW2G introduces a novel method for prompt-based continual learning that adaptively decides when to grow prompt sets based on task differences, improving efficiency and knowledge sharing.
Contribution
The paper proposes LW2G, a plug-in approach that dynamically grows prompt sets by measuring task differences with HFC, enhancing continual learning performance.
Findings
LW2G outperforms existing prompt-based methods in accuracy.
The dynamic growing approach effectively balances prompt pool size and task adaptation.
Extensive experiments validate the method's efficiency and effectiveness.
Abstract
Recent Prompt-based Continual learning (PCL) has achieved remarkable performance with pre-trained models. These approaches expand a prompt pool by adding a new set of prompts while learning and select the correct set during inference. Previous studies have revealed that learning task-wised prompt sets individually and low selection accuracy pose challenges to the performance of PCL. In this paper, we propose a plug-in method, earning hether o row , which leverages the disparities between tasks to form an effective and efficient prompt sets pool, thereby achieving intra-task knowledge sharing and cooperation and avoiding the unbounded increase in the cost of the prompt pool. Specifically, a shared set is utilized when several tasks share certain commonalities, and a new set is added when there are significant differences…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
The motivation of the proposed method is clear. There are theoretical supports. The experimental superiority over baselines can be seen.
1. It seems to me that this paper is the application of the technique in [1] to the existing methods with the criteria to expand the prompt pool. However, this technique is quite similar to those in [2], [3]. The authors should highlight the novelty and innovative contribution of this work. 2. It is not clear how the performance on CUB of HiDE is has minimal change, while those on CIFAR100 and ImageNet-R is decrease significantly. If the codebase of HiDE has some problem, why didn't the author
- LW2G is an approach that actively decides whether to grow new prompts or reuse existing ones for each new task. This aspect distinguishes LW2G from previous methods. - Introduces a new Hinder Forward Capability (HFC) metric to quantify the hindrance of learning a new task on old prompts under orthogonality constraints. - The three main components of LW2G - DGA, CPK, and FFT - provide a complete implementation for reusing existing prompts in continual learning tasks. However, to some extent,
- One important aspect missing from the experiments in this paper is the average results from multiple runs. This is particularly evident in the paper, as the experimental results in Tables 1, 2, and 3 show that the proposed method has only a slight difference compared to the baselines. It's quite possible that running the baselines multiple times could yield a better result. I'm not claiming that this paper has done so. But providing the mean and standard deviation would better demonstrate stat
(1)By learning whether to grow or not to grow set of prompts, this work forms an effective and efficient prompt sets pool where each single set contains knowledge from multiple tasks, thus facilitating cross-task promotion. (2)LW2G is a plug-in and effective module within existing PCL.
I have two main concerns: (1)The proposed LW2G is mainly designed for prompt-based CL methods, and further improves their performances. However, the improvements with respect to the mainstream CL metrics, FAA and FMM, as shown in Table 1, are not significant. In particular, for some stronger baselines, S-prompt++, the performance with LW2G makes no obvious performance. (2)It seems that the performance reported on the Hide-prompt paper is better than that in this work, in which Hide-prompt even
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEducation and Critical Thinking Development
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training · Focus
