Balanced Splitting: A Framework for Achieving Zero-wait in the Multiserver-job Model

TL;DR

This paper introduces Balanced-Splitting, a scheduling framework for multiserver-job systems that ensures zero-wait in large-scale regimes by static server partitioning, improving delay performance without preemption or job size knowledge.

Contribution

The paper proposes a novel static, balanced server partitioning framework and a scheduling policy that guarantees stability and zero-wait in multiserver-job models, with theoretical and empirical validation.

Findings

Queueing probability vanishes in large-server regimes.

Balanced-Splitting outperforms several existing policies in simulations.

Delays are competitive with state-of-the-art preemptive policies.

Abstract

We present a new framework for designing nonpreemptive and job-size oblivious scheduling policies in the multiserver-job queueing model. The main requirement is to identify a static and balanced sub-partition of the server set and ensure that the servers in each set of that sub-partition can only handle jobs of a given class and in a first-come first-served order. A job class is determined by the number of servers to which it has exclusive access during its entire execution and the probability distribution of its service time. This approach aims to reduce delays by preventing small jobs from being blocked by larger ones that arrived first, and it is particularly beneficial when the job size variability intra resp. inter classes is small resp. large. In this setting, we propose a new scheduling policy, Balanced-Splitting. We provide a sufficient condition for the stability of Balanced-Splitting and show that the resulting queueing probability, i.e., the probability that an arriving job needs to wait for processing upon arrival, vanishes in both the subcritical (the load is kept fixed to a constant less than one) and critical (the load approaches one from below) many-server limiting regimes. Crucial to our analysis is a connection with the M/GI/s/s queue and Erlang's loss formula, which allows our analysis to rely on fundamental results from queueing theory. Numerical simulations show that the proposed policy performs better than several preemptive/nonpreemptive size-aware/oblivious policies in various practical scenarios. This is also confirmed by simulations running on real traces from High Performance Computing (HPC) workloads. The delays induced by Balanced-Splitting are also competitive with those induced by state-of-the-art policies such as First-Fit-SRPT and ServerFilling-SRPT, though our approach has the advantage of not requiring preemption, nor the knowledge of job sizes.