
TL;DR
This paper investigates the validity of Gr"{u}n's lemma in the context of perfect skew braces, demonstrating its applicability for perfect two-sided skew braces when using the annihilator.
Contribution
It introduces the use of the annihilator instead of the socle and establishes conditions under which Gr"{u}n's lemma holds for perfect skew braces.
Findings
Gr"{u}n's lemma holds for perfect two-sided skew braces with the annihilator.
The lemma does not hold in general for all perfect skew braces.
Using the annihilator instead of the socle is key to the positive result.
Abstract
By previous work of Ced\'{o}, Smoktunowicz, and Vendramin, one already knows that the analog of Gr\"{u}n's lemma fails to hold for perfect skew left braces when the socle is used as an analog of the center of a group. In this paper, we use the annihilator instead of the socle. We shall show that the analog of Gr\"{u}n's lemma holds for perfect two-sided skew braces but not in general.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
