Evaluation of Large Language Models for Summarization Tasks in the Medical Domain: A Narrative Review
Emma Croxford, Yanjun Gao, Nicholas Pellegrino, Karen K. Wong, Graham, Wills, Elliot First, Frank J. Liao, Cherodeep Goswami, Brian Patterson, Majid, Afshar

TL;DR
This paper reviews how large language models are evaluated for medical text summarization, highlighting current challenges and proposing future directions to improve assessment methods in high-stakes clinical applications.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of evaluation methods for clinical summarization by large language models and suggests future research directions to overcome resource limitations.
Findings
Current evaluation methods are resource-intensive and limited in scope.
There is a need for standardized, scalable evaluation frameworks.
Future directions include developing automated and semi-automated evaluation techniques.
Abstract
Large Language Models have advanced clinical Natural Language Generation, creating opportunities to manage the volume of medical text. However, the high-stakes nature of medicine requires reliable evaluation, which remains a challenge. In this narrative review, we assess the current evaluation state for clinical summarization tasks and propose future directions to address the resource constraints of expert human evaluation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
