Magic state cultivation: growing T states as cheap as CNOT gates
Craig Gidney, Noah Shutty, Cody Jones

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method called magic state cultivation that efficiently produces high-fidelity T states within surface code patches, potentially reducing or eliminating the need for further magic state distillation.
Contribution
It presents a novel cultivation technique that grows T states gradually, using comparable resources to a CNOT gate, and achieves lower logical error rates with fewer qubit-rounds than previous methods.
Findings
Achieves logical error rates as low as 2e-9 at certain noise levels.
Uses an order of magnitude fewer qubit-rounds than prior approaches.
Strongly responds to physical noise improvements, reducing the need for distillation.
Abstract
We refine ideas from Knill 1996, Jones 2016, Chamberland 2020, Gidney 2023+2024, Bombin 2024, and Hirano 2024 to efficiently prepare good states. We call our construction "magic state cultivation" because it gradually grows the size and reliability of one state. Cultivation fits inside a surface code patch and uses roughly the same number of physical gates as a lattice surgery CNOT gate of equivalent reliability. We estimate the infidelity of cultivation (from injection to idling at distance 15) using a mix of state vector simulation, stabilizer simulation, error enumeration, and Monte Carlo sampling. Compared to prior work, cultivation uses an order of magnitude fewer qubit-rounds to reach logical error rates as low as when subjected to uniform depolarizing circuit noise. Halving the circuit noise to improves the achievable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic and Technological Innovation
