Logic-of-Thought: Injecting Logic into Contexts for Full Reasoning in Large Language Models
Tongxuan Liu, Wenjiang Xu, Weizhe Huang, Yuting Zeng, Jiaxing Wang,, Xingyu Wang, Hailong Yang, Jing Li

TL;DR
This paper introduces Logic-of-Thought prompting, a method that uses propositional logic to expand logical information in contexts, significantly improving the reasoning performance of large language models across multiple tasks.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel Logic-of-Thought prompting technique that enhances logical reasoning in LLMs by ensuring information completeness and can be combined with existing prompting methods.
Findings
LoT improves reasoning accuracy across five tasks.
Significant performance gains on ReClor, RuleTaker, and ProofWriter datasets.
LoT boosts Chain-of-Thought and Tree-of-Thoughts methods.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various tasks but their performance in complex logical reasoning tasks remains unsatisfactory. Although some prompting methods, such as Chain-of-Thought, can improve the reasoning ability of LLMs to some extent, they suffer from an unfaithful issue where derived conclusions may not align with the generated reasoning chain. To address this issue, some studies employ the approach of propositional logic to further enhance logical reasoning abilities of LLMs. However, the potential omissions in the extraction of logical expressions in these methods can cause information loss in the logical reasoning process, thereby generating incorrect results. To this end, we propose Logic-of-Thought (LoT) prompting which employs propositional logic to generate expanded logical information descriptions and utilizes them as an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies
MethodsALIGN
