Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning
Debargha Ganguly, Srinivasan Iyengar, Vipin Chaudhary, Shivkumar, Kalyanaraman

TL;DR
Proof of Thought enhances LLM reasoning by integrating formal logic verification with a hybrid human-interpretable representation, improving reliability and transparency in complex, novel domains.
Contribution
Introduces a neurosymbolic framework that converts LLM outputs into formal logic for verification, with a flexible, human-understandable JSON-based domain-specific language.
Findings
Improved performance on StrategyQA benchmark
Effective verification of reasoning steps
Enhanced interpretability of LLM outputs
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet they struggle with inconsistent reasoning, particularly in novel domains and complex logical sequences. This research introduces Proof of Thought, a framework that enhances the reliability and transparency of LLM outputs. Our approach bridges LLM-generated ideas with formal logic verification, employing a custom interpreter to convert LLM outputs into First Order Logic constructs for theorem prover scrutiny. Central to our method is an intermediary JSON-based Domain-Specific Language, which by design balances precise logical structures with intuitive human concepts. This hybrid representation enables both rigorous validation and accessible human comprehension of LLM reasoning processes. Key contributions include a robust type system with sort management for enhanced logical integrity, explicit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Formal Methods in Verification · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
