JOYS+ study of solid state $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C isotope ratios in protostellar envelopes: Observations of CO and CO$_2$ ice with JWST
N. G. C. Brunken, E. F. van Dishoeck, K. Slavicinska, V. J. M. le, Gouellec, W. R. M. Rocha, L. Francis, L. Tychoniec, M. L. van Gelder, M. G., Navarro, A. C. A. Boogert, P. J. Kavanagh, P. Nazari, T. Greene, M. E., Ressler, L. Majumdar

TL;DR
This study uses JWST observations to measure solid-state carbon isotope ratios in protostellar envelopes, revealing that ices inherit elevated isotope ratios from earlier stages and fractionation increases over time.
Contribution
First high-sensitivity JWST measurements of solid CO and CO$_2$ isotope ratios in 17 low-mass protostars, providing new insights into isotope evolution from stellar nurseries to planetary systems.
Findings
$^{12}$CO$_2$/$^{13}$CO$_2$ ratios are around 76-97
$^{12}$CO/$^{13}$CO ratios are approximately 165
Ices inherit elevated isotope ratios before the pre-stellar stage
Abstract
The carbon isotope ratio is a powerful tool for studying the evolution of stellar systems. Recent detections of CO isotopologues in disks and exoplanet atmospheres pointed towards significant fractionation in these systems. In order to understand the evolution of this quantity, it is crucial to trace the isotope abundance from stellar nurseries to planetary systems. During the protostellar stage the multiple vibrational modes of CO and CO ice provide a unique opportunity to examine the carbon isotope ratio in the solid state. Now with the sensitivity of the \textit{James Webb Space Telescope}, these absorption features have become accessible at high S/N in Solar-mass systems. We quantify the CO/CO and the CO/CO isotope ratios in 17 class 0/I low mass protostars from the CO combination modes (2.70 m and 2.77 m), the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
