The diverse star formation histories of early massive, quenched galaxies in modern galaxy formation simulations

TL;DR

This study compares predictions from various galaxy formation models and simulations regarding the star formation histories of massive, quenched galaxies at redshift 3, highlighting differences driven by feedback models and emphasizing the potential for future observations to test these models.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive comparison of semi-analytic models and hydrodynamical simulations, revealing how different AGN feedback implementations affect galaxy quenching predictions.

Findings

Predictions vary in number density and stellar mass function of quenched galaxies.

Most simulations show starburst activity before quenching, with variations.

Quenching timescales range from 20 to 150 million years.

Abstract

We present a comprehensive study of the star formation histories of massive-quenched galaxies at $z=3$ in 3 semi-analytic models (SHARK, GAEA, GALFORM) and 3 cosmological hydrodynamical simulations (EAGLE, IllustrisTNG, Simba). We study the predicted number density and stellar mass function of massive-quenched galaxies, their formation and quenching timescales and star-formation properties of their progenitors. Predictions are disparate in all these diagnostics, for instance: (i) some simulations reproduce the observed number density of very massive-quenched galaxies ($>10^{11}\rm M_{\odot}$) but underpredict the high density of intermediate-mass ones, while others fit well the lower masses but underpredict the higher ones; (ii) In most simulations, except for GAEA and EAGLE, most massive-quenched galaxies had starburst periods, with the most intense ones happening at $4<z<5$; however, only in SHARK and IllustrisTNG we do find a large number of progenitors with star formation rates $>300\rm M_{\odot}\,yr^{-1}$; (iii) quenching timescales are in the range $\approx 20-150$~Myr depending on the simulation; among other differences. These disparate predictions can be tied to the adopted Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) feedback model. For instance, the explicit black-hole (BH) mass dependence to trigger the "radio mode" in IllustrisTNG and Simba makes it difficult to produce quenched galaxies with intermediate stellar masses, also leading to higher baryon collapse efficiencies ($\approx 15-30$%); while the strong bolometric luminosity dependence of the AGN outflow rate in GAEA leads to BHs of modest mass quenching galaxies. Current observations are unable to distinguish between these different predictions due to the small sample sizes. However, these predictions are testable with current facilities and upcoming observations, allowing a "true physics experiment" to be carried out.