Analytical assessment of workers' safety concerning direct and indirect ways of getting infected by dangerous pathogen
Krzysztof Domino, Arkadiusz Sochan, Jaros{\l}aw Adam Miszczak

TL;DR
This paper presents an analytical model for assessing infection risks among industrial workers from airborne pathogens, considering both direct and indirect transmission, enabling rapid safety policy development.
Contribution
It introduces a simple, adaptable analytical model based on COVID-19 observations that can be used for real-time risk assessment and prevention policy formulation in industrial environments.
Findings
Validated droplet spread model with simulations
Model enables rapid danger assessment in industrial settings
Proposed countermeasures for infection prevention
Abstract
Developing safety policies to protect large groups of individuals working in indoor environments from disease spread is an important and challenging task. To address this issue, we investigate the scenario of workers becoming infected by a dangerous airborne pathogen in a near-real-life industrial environment. We present a simple analytical model based on observations made during the recent COVID-19 pandemic and business expectations concerning worker protection. The model can be adapted to address other epidemic or non-epidemic threats, including hazardous vapors from industrial processes. In the presented model, we consider both direct and indirect modes of infection. Direct infection occurs through direct contact with an infected individual, while indirect infection results from contact with a contaminated environment, including airborne pathogens in enclosed spaces or contaminated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHuman Health and Disease
