Implicit assessment of language learning during practice as accurate as explicit testing
Jue Hou, Anisia Katinskaia, Anh-Duc Vu, Roman Yangarber

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that implicit assessment of language learning during practice exercises can be as accurate as explicit testing, using IRT models trained on learner data to estimate ability efficiently and effectively.
Contribution
It introduces a method to estimate learner ability directly from practice exercises by linking them to linguistic constructs within an IRT framework, eliminating the need for exhaustive tests.
Findings
IRT-based models accurately estimate learner ability from exercises
Adaptive tests can replace exhaustive proficiency assessments
Exercise-based ability estimates align with teacher assessments
Abstract
Assessment of proficiency of the learner is an essential part of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS). We use Item Response Theory (IRT) in computer-aided language learning for assessment of student ability in two contexts: in test sessions, and in exercises during practice sessions. Exhaustive testing across a wide range of skills can provide a detailed picture of proficiency, but may be undesirable for a number of reasons. Therefore, we first aim to replace exhaustive tests with efficient but accurate adaptive tests. We use learner data collected from exhaustive tests under imperfect conditions, to train an IRT model to guide adaptive tests. Simulations and experiments with real learner data confirm that this approach is efficient and accurate. Second, we explore whether we can accurately estimate learner ability directly from the context of practice with exercises, without testing. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStudent Assessment and Feedback
