Search for $C\!P$ violation in $D^+_{(s)}\to{}K_{S}^{0}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}$ decays using triple and quadruple products
Belle, Belle II Collaborations: L. Aggarwal, H. Ahmed, H. Aihara,, N. Akopov, A. Aloisio, N. Althubiti, N. Anh Ky, D. M. Asner, H. Atmacan, V., Aushev, M. Aversano, R. Ayad, V. Babu, H. Bae, N. K. Baghel, S. Bahinipati,, P. Bambade, Sw. Banerjee, J. Baudot, A. Baur, A. Beaubien

TL;DR
This study conducts the first search for $C ext{P}$ violation in specific charm meson decays using combined data from Belle and Belle II, measuring asymmetries with high precision and finding no evidence of violation.
Contribution
It introduces the first measurement of $C ext{P}$ violation asymmetries in $D_{(s)}^{+} o K_{S}^{0}K^{-} ext{pi}^{+} ext{pi}^{+}$ decays using combined Belle and Belle II data, achieving unprecedented precision.
Findings
No evidence of $C ext{P}$ violation was observed.
Most precise measurements to date for triple-product asymmetries in $D^+$ decays.
First measurements of certain asymmetries in charm decays.
Abstract
We perform the first search for violation in decays. We use a combined data set from the Belle and Belle II experiments, which study collisions at center-of-mass energies at or near the resonance. We use 980 fb of data from Belle and 428 fb of data from Belle~II. We measure six -violating asymmetries that are based on triple products and quadruple products of the momenta of final-state particles, and also the particles' helicity angles. We obtain a precision at the level of 0.5% for decays, and better than 0.3% for decays. No evidence of violation is found. Our results for the triple-product asymmetries are the most precise to date for singly-Cabibbo-suppressed decays. Our results for the other…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
