Custodial and Non-Custodial Wallets
Tony Seymour, Geoff Goodell

TL;DR
This paper compares custodial and non-custodial cryptocurrency wallets, highlighting their differences, features, and associated risks, to inform users about secure digital asset management options.
Contribution
It provides a detailed characterization of custodial versus non-custodial wallets, emphasizing their key features and risk profiles.
Findings
Non-custodial wallets give users full control over private keys.
Custodial wallets involve third-party management, reducing user responsibility.
Risks differ significantly between the two wallet types.
Abstract
Non-custodial wallets are a type of cryptocurrency wallet wherein the owner has full control over the private keys and is solely responsible for managing and securing the digital assets that it contains. Unlike custodial wallets, which are managed by third parties, such as exchanges, non-custodial wallets ensure that funds are controlled exclusively by the end user. We characterise the difference between custodial and non-custodial wallets and examine their key features and related risks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Insurance and Financial Risk Management · Housing Market and Economics
