Locality vs Quantum Codes
Samuel Dai, Ray Li

TL;DR
This paper establishes fundamental limits on the amount of non-local interactions needed in quantum error-correcting codes to surpass certain locality bounds, providing optimal tradeoffs and implications for code design.
Contribution
It provides a complete characterization of the tradeoffs between locality and parameters of quantum codes, including optimal bounds on interaction length and count, generalizing prior results.
Findings
Interaction length and count are asymptotically optimal for improving code parameters.
Surpassing the BPT bound requires at least \\Omega(\#^*) interactions of length \\Omega(\\ell^*).
Certain code architectures, like hypergraph product codes, cannot be implemented in stacked architectures.
Abstract
This paper proves optimal tradeoffs between the locality and parameters of quantum error-correcting codes. Quantum codes give a promising avenue towards quantum fault tolerance, but the practical constraint of locality limits their quality. The seminal Bravyi-Poulin-Terhal (BPT) bound says that a quantum stabilizer code with 2D-locality must satisfy . We answer the natural question: for better code parameters, how much "non-locality" is needed? In particular, (i) how long must the long-range interactions be, and (ii) how many long-range interactions must there be? We give a complete answer to both questions for all : above the BPT bound, any 2D-embedding must have at least interactions of length , where and . Conversely, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
