Adaptive weight selection for time-to-event data under non-proportional hazards
Moritz Fabian Danzer, Ina Dormuth

TL;DR
This paper proposes an adaptive, multi-stage approach for time-to-event clinical trials that improves robustness under non-proportional hazards by combining flexible testing methods and survival curve extrapolation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel adaptive multi-stage design with combination tests and spline-based survival extrapolation for more flexible and robust analysis under uncertain effect patterns.
Findings
The method can save inconclusive trials.
It maintains high power under non-proportional hazards.
The approach is validated with real data and simulations.
Abstract
When planning a clinical trial for a time-to-event endpoint, we require an estimated effect size and need to consider the type of effect. Usually, an effect of proportional hazards is assumed with the hazard ratio as the corresponding effect measure. Thus, the standard procedure for survival data is generally based on a single-stage log-rank test. Knowing that the assumption of proportional hazards is often violated and sufficient knowledge to derive reasonable effect sizes is usually unavailable, such an approach is relatively rigid. We introduce a more flexible procedure by combining two methods designed to be more robust in case we have little to no prior knowledge. First, we employ a more flexible adaptive multi-stage design instead of a single-stage design. Second, we apply combination-type tests in the first stage of our suggested procedure to benefit from their robustness under…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFault Detection and Control Systems · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
