Local Tabularity is Decidable for Bi-Intermediate Logics of Trees and of Co-Trees
Miguel Martins, Tommaso Moraschini

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining local tabularity for finitely axiomatizable extensions of bi-G"odel logic, characterized by co-tree structures, is a decidable problem, advancing understanding of bi-Heyting algebra logics.
Contribution
It establishes the decidability of local tabularity for extensions of bi-G"odel logic using co-tree structures, and shows that the logic of finite co-trees is finitely axiomatizable and decidable.
Findings
Local tabularity is decidable for extensions of bi-G"odel logic.
The logic of finite co-trees, called Log(FC), is finitely axiomatizable.
Log(FC) has the finite model property, ensuring decidability.
Abstract
A bi-Heyting algebra validates the G\"odel-Dummett axiom iff the poset of its prime filters is a disjoint union of co-trees (i.e., order duals of trees). Bi-Heyting algebras of this kind are called bi-G\"odel algebras and form a variety that algebraizes the extension of bi-intuitionistic logic axiomatized by the G\"odel-Dummett axiom. In this paper we establish the decidability of the problem of determining if a finitely axiomatizable extension of is locally tabular. Notably, if is an extension of , then is locally tabular iff is not contained in , the logic of a particular family of finite co-trees, called the finite combs. We prove that is finitely axiomatizable. Since this logic also has the finite model property, it is therefore…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · semigroups and automata theory
