Reliable and diverse evaluation of LLM medical knowledge mastery
Yuxuan Zhou, Xien Liu, Chen Ning, Xiao Zhang, Ji Wu

TL;DR
This paper introduces PretexEval, a novel framework for reliably and diversely evaluating medical knowledge mastery in LLMs by generating variant test samples that address factual errors and lack of diversity.
Contribution
The study presents a new evaluation framework using predicate equivalence transformations to produce reliable, diverse test samples for assessing medical knowledge in LLMs.
Findings
Current LLMs show significant gaps in medical knowledge mastery.
Existing benchmarks may overestimate LLMs' medical understanding.
LLMs need improved in-depth medical knowledge before clinical application.
Abstract
Mastering medical knowledge is crucial for medical-specific LLMs. However, despite the existence of medical benchmarks like MedQA, a unified framework that fully leverages existing knowledge bases to evaluate LLMs' mastery of medical knowledge is still lacking. In the study, we propose a novel framework PretexEval that dynamically generates reliable and diverse test samples to evaluate LLMs for any given medical knowledge base. We notice that test samples produced directly from knowledge bases by templates or LLMs may introduce factual errors and also lack diversity. To address these issues, we introduce a novel schema into our proposed evaluation framework that employs predicate equivalence transformations to produce a series of variants for any given medical knowledge point. Finally, these produced predicate variants are converted into textual language, resulting in a series of…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
- Novel Evaluation Method: PretexEval introduces a fresh approach by transforming knowledge points into diverse predicates, effectively improving both the reliability and comprehensiveness of LLM evaluation. This is particularly relevant in fields like healthcare, where factual consistency is crucial. - Focus on Consistency: The framework’s use of joint accuracy to measure consistency across expressions of the same knowledge point is a valuable contribution. In healthcare, where consistency is k
- Scope of Evaluation Tasks: The framework is limited to true/false verification tasks, which could constrain its applicability in complex medical scenarios where contextual understanding and reasoning are required. - Prototype Dependence: Manually crafted prototypes, while improving reliability, may limit scalability and introduce potential subjectivity. Refining this step or automating parts of it could enhance PretexEval’s flexibility. Reliability here is measured by two annotators on a 50-sa
- PretexEval introduces a new approach to testing medical knowledge in language models. Rather than using fixed test questions, it dynamically generates diverse test cases that probe deeper understanding. This represents a significant methodological advancement in AI evaluation. - The authors create a reliable yet flexible testing framework by combining predicate transformations with natural language generation. The method is both principled and practical, with clear steps for reproduction. - Th
The study's methodology, while strong, has a few areas that could be strengthened. - Though clearly explained for simple relationships, the predicate transformation concept lacks a formal specification for handling complex medical relationships that don't cleanly map to simple predicates. - Further, the evaluation is limited to one relationship test in a multiple-choice setting, which may not fully capture the complexity of medical knowledge application. Exploring the handling of multiple vari
Originality: The concept of dynamically generating test samples from medical knowledge bases using predicate equivalence transformations is innovative. Quality: The experimental design is robust, involving a comprehensive evaluation of 12 well-known LLMs across two distinct medical knowledge bases. The methodology for transforming predicates into diverse textual samples ensures that the evaluations are rigorous. The detailed ablation study and the use of two evaluation metrics (average accuracy
1) The limitations of the proposed approach should be discussed in the paper: - The PretexEval framework heavily relies on predicate transformations to generate test samples. While this approach contributes to sample diversity, it may not adequately capture the complexity or the nuances of medical reasoning that goes beyond simple factual recall. - The current evaluation metrics, while useful, focus predominantly on binary true/false assessments of knowledge mastery. This binary approach might o
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiology practices and education · Innovations in Medical Education · Biomedical and Engineering Education
