Properties of non-cryogenic DTs and their relevance for fusion

TL;DR

This paper analyzes non-cryogenic deuterium-tritium compounds for fusion, showing they are more versatile and easier to ignite than previously thought, with implications for fusion energy development.

Contribution

It demonstrates that ionic stopping power is significant at high temperatures, leading to higher ionic temperatures and easier ignition of non-cryogenic DT fuels, expanding their potential.

Findings

Ionic stopping power is non-negligible above 10 keV.

Heavy beryllium borohydride ignites more easily than beryllium hydride.

Non-cryogenic DT fuels are more versatile and easier to ignite than previously modeled.

Abstract

In inertial confinement fusion, pure deuterium-tritium (DT) is usually used as a fusion fuel. In their paper \cite{gus2011effect}, Guskov et al. instead propose using low-Z compounds that contain DT and are non-cryogenic at room temperature. They suggest that these fuels (here called non-cryogenic DTs) can be ignited for $\rho_{DT} R \geq 0.35 \, gcm^{-2}$ and $kT_{e} \geq 14 \, keV$, i.e., parameters which are more stringent but still in the same order of magnitude as those for DT. In deriving these results the authors in \cite{gus2011effect} assume that ionic and electronic temperatures are equal and consider only electronic stopping power. Here, we show that at temperatures greater than 10 keV, ionic stopping power is not negligible compared to the electronic one. We demonstrate that this necessarily leads to higher ionic than electronic temperatures. Both factors facilitate ignition compared to the model used in \cite{gus2011effect} showing that non-cryogenic DT compounds are more versatile than previously known. In addition, we find that heavy beryllium borohydride ignites more easily than heavy beryllium hydride, the best-performing fuel found by Guskov et al. Our results are based on an analytical model that incorporates a detailed stopping power analysis, as well as on numerical simulations using an improved version of the community hydro code MULTI-IFE. Alleviating the constraints and costs of cryogenic technology and the fact that non-cryogenic DT fuels are solids at room temperature open up new design options for fusion targets with $Q>100$ and thus contribute to the larger goal of making inertial fusion energy an economically viable source of clean energy. In addition, the discussion presented here generalizes the analysis of fuels for energy production.