Validating a main beam treatment of parametric, pixel-based component separation in the context of CMB observations
Arianna Rizzieri, Josquin Errard, Radek Stompor

TL;DR
This paper introduces a beam correction method for parametric component separation in CMB data, enabling higher resolution CMB map reconstruction without preprocessing, validated through simulations, and effective especially with spatially variable foregrounds.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel beam correction technique integrated into the maximum-likelihood parametric component separation, improving resolution and accuracy in CMB map reconstruction without additional preprocessing.
Findings
Successfully recovers spectral parameters and component maps when the sky model is parametric.
Provides higher resolution CMB maps with nearly optimal noise levels.
Potentially more accurate with spatially variable foreground properties.
Abstract
We implement a simple, main beam correction in the maximum-likelihood, parametric component separation approach, which allows on accounting for different beamwidths of input maps at different frequencies without any preprocessing. We validate the approach on full-sky and cut-sky simulations and discuss the importance and impact of the assumptions and simplifications. We find that, in the cases when the underlying sky model is indeed parametric, the method successfully recovers component spectral parameters and component maps at the pre-defined resolution. The improvement on the precision of the estimated spectral parameters is found to be minor due to the redness of the foreground angular spectra, however the method is potentially more accurate, in particular if the foreground properties display strong, spatial variability, as it does not assume commutation of the beam smoothing and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
