On internally projective sheaves of groups
David W\"arn

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties of internally projective sheaves of abelian groups, providing a counterexample that demonstrates their instability under base change, thus clarifying the limitations of internal projectivity.
Contribution
It presents the first explicit example showing that internally projective sheaves of abelian groups are not stable under base change, highlighting a key difference from classical projectivity.
Findings
Internally projective sheaves are not stable under base change.
Counterexample derived from recent work on light condensed sets.
Internal projectivity is weaker than classical projectivity.
Abstract
A sheaf of modules on a site is said to be internally projective if sheaf hom with the module preserves epimorphism. In this note, we give an example showing that internally projective sheaves of abelian groups are not in general stable under base change to a slice. This shows that internal projectivity is weaker than projectivity in the internal logic of the topos, as expressed for example in terms of Shulman's stack semantics. The sheaf of groups that we use as a counterexample comes from recent work by Clausen and Scholze on light condensed sets.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPolynomial and algebraic computation · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
