A Systematic Post-Processing Approach for Quantitative $T_{1\rho}$ Imaging of Knee Articular Cartilage

TL;DR

This paper presents an automated pipeline combining image standardization, deep learning segmentation, and subregion parcellation to accurately quantify $T_{1 ho}$ relaxation times in knee cartilage, validated on healthy and osteoarthritic subjects.

Contribution

It introduces a novel automated post-processing pipeline for $T_{1 ho}$ imaging of knee cartilage, integrating deep learning and subregion analysis for improved reliability.

Findings

High agreement between automated and manual $T_{1 ho}$ quantification.

No significant difference in 17-18 of 20 subregions between methods.

Low RMSDs and negligible bias in $T_{1 ho}$ measurements.

Abstract

Objective: To establish an automated pipeline for post-processing of quantitative spin-lattice relaxation time constant in the rotating frame ($T_{1\rho}$) imaging of knee articular cartilage. Design: The proposed post-processing pipeline commences with an image standardisation procedure, followed by deep learning-based segmentation to generate cartilage masks. The articular cartilage is then automatically parcellated into 20 subregions, where $T_{1\rho}$ quantification is performed. The proposed pipeline was retrospectively validated on a dataset comprising knee $T_{1\rho}$ images of 10 healthy volunteers and 30 patients with knee osteoarthritis. Three experiments were conducted, namely an assessment of segmentation model performance (using Dice similarity coefficients, DSCs); an evaluation of the impact of standardisation; and a test of $T_{1\rho}$ quantification accuracy (using paired t-tests; root-mean-square deviations, RMSDs; and coefficients of variance of RMSDs, $CV_{RMSD}$). Statistical significance was set as p<0.05. Results: There was a substantial agreement between the subregional $T_{1\rho}$ quantification from the model-predicted masks and those from the manual segmentation labels. In patients, 17 of 20 subregions, and in healthy volunteers, 18 out of 20 subregions, demonstrated no significant difference between predicted and reference $T_{1\rho}$ quantifications. Average RMSDs were 0.79 ms for patients and 0.56 ms for healthy volunteers, while average $CV_{RMSD}$ were 1.97% and 1.38% for patients and healthy volunteers. Bland-Altman plots showed negligible bias across all subregions for patients and healthy volunteers. Conclusion: The proposed pipeline can perform automatic and reliable post-processing of quantitative $T_{1\rho}$ images of knee articular cartilage.