Choice of the hypothesis matrix for using the Anova-type-statistic
Paavo Sattler, Manuel Rosenbaum

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different hypothesis matrices affect the Anova-type-statistic (ATS) in multivariate hypothesis testing, proposing methods to reduce computation time while maintaining consistent test decisions.
Contribution
It introduces a way to construct minimal companion matrices for ATS that test the same hypotheses and produce identical decisions, optimizing computational efficiency.
Findings
Constructed minimal companion matrices for ATS
Achieved consistent test decisions with reduced matrix size
Demonstrated computational savings through simulations
Abstract
Initially developed in Brunner et al. (1997), the Anova-type-statistic (ATS) is one of the most used quadratic forms for testing multivariate hypotheses for a variety of different parameter vectors . Such tests can be based on several versions of ATS and in most settings, they are preferable over those based on other quadratic forms, as for example the Wald-type-statistic (WTS). However, the same null hypothesis can be expressed by a multitude of hypothesis matrices and corresponding vectors , which leads to different values of the test statistic, as it can be seen in simple examples. Since this can entail distinct test decisions, it remains to investigate under which conditions tests using different hypothesis matrices coincide.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Research in Systems and Signal Processing
